It is currently 19 Apr 2026 10:12

Maintaining SSD-inc involves a lot of time and money. Help us by behaving nicely!




 Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 10:17 
Scottish Leaders' Debate @ 10.30 BST - Live feed from SKY via stv:

http://www.live.stv.tv/


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 13:43 
SSDi God
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 16:32
Posts: 4371
yawn!



_________________
Image

Clanpay link below
http://www.gameservers.com/clanpay/?clanid=b5701433fa91d58374b576769ae6d3ca
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 14:18 
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 18:41
Posts: 5715
Location: Edinburgh
Serialkiller {l Wrote}:
yawn!

lol
GothicKnight {l Wrote}:
Scottish Leaders' Debate @ 10.30 BST - Live feed from SKY via stv:

http://www.live.stv.tv/

SNP? google "hollie greig"
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4757-scottish-government-cover-up-of-hollie-greig-part-1-how-it-all-came-to-light


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 15:03 
wavy {l Wrote}:


{l Quote}:
Hollie and her mother, Anne, have been campaigning since 2000 when police were first informed of the alleged abuse, for criminal proceedings to be taken against those she says were involved.

Read more: http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Articl ... z0m7VtsDLn


Labour controlled Holyrood until 2008 - so the campaign that ended during SNPs tenure at Holyrood had been going on for 8 years during labour Administration!

The law states clearly, that in cases where a child is the witness, the child would need substantiated witness statements. As there were no statements, then no prosecution could take place!

This is a mix of outdated westminster Legislation, and irresponsible Labour Administration up to 2008, and yes Davy I finger Labour, why? Coz they made the changed to the law to prevent testimony from a child in such cases!

And Davy, check you facebook and see why I find your link and this case repulsive, as it must be changed!


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 15:33 
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 18:41
Posts: 5715
Location: Edinburgh
1, hollie grieg was awarded victim compensation therefore a case was there to answer.
2 the people accused were the Aberdeen senior sheriff (scottish Judge) 2 senior policemen, a social worker and her father. after her mother reported this to the police, she was sectioned under the mental health act by her husband and a sheriff, guess who?
3 the procurator fiscal at aberdeen would not prosecute her own sheriff or police
4 the procurator fiscal used her own money to silence the UK press. she now has the most senior judicial position in scotland and is answerable to the scottish government.
5 yes it was a labour government at the time but we have had over two years of SNP who refuse to investigate or even discuss this.
alex salmond and kenny macaskill, whom i have met both, have the power to instigate an investigation and refuse to do so.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 15:58 
wavy {l Wrote}:
1, hollie grieg was awarded victim compensation therefore a case was there to answer.
2 the people accused were the Aberdeen senior sheriff (scottish Judge) 2 senior policemen, a social worker and her father. after her mother reported this to the police, she was sectioned under the mental health act by her husband and a sheriff, guess who?
3 the procurator fiscal at aberdeen would not prosecute her own sheriff or police
4 the procurator fiscal used her own money to silence the UK press. she now has the most senior judicial position in scotland and is answerable to the scottish government.
5 yes it was a labour government at the time but we have had over two years of SNP who refuse to investigate or even discuss this.
alex salmond and kenny macaskill, whom i have met both, have the power to instigate an investigation and refuse to do so.


You're going the wrong way about it. That’s why you are at an impasse.

Firstly, you must remove any and all involvement from the Media, as the principle ethos regards protecting a child is to protect the identity - this is likely to be the reason the PF has gagged the Media.

Secondly, you need to discuss a way forward with your MSP. He/She is likely to have been a lawyer, and will put you on the right track, whether it would be to force a Judicial Review or such like.

There may be a ‘crossroad’ regards legislation that means Salmond cannot be involved. Ie, the fact that a child must have substantiated statements, even in cases where evidence is overwhelming, could be Reserved to Westminster, as likely the legislation involved is Constitutional, and the Scottish Constitution has not been Devolved to Holyrood, because if it was Independence would be easy for Scotland.

Maybe looking at the paragraph above could give you an option for discussion with Salmond and Macaskil, as if their hands are tied in these respects, they can then advise you how to deal with this at Westminster?

As for the police, you should refer your complaint to the IPCC, and as for the PF, you should refer it to the Bar association responsible for PFs, I’m not sure which one but this link may help:

http://www.scottishlaw.org.uk/lawfirms/advocates.htm


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 16:17 
More to do, Davy:

- Approach all Parties involved in the case, and present them with a request, as stipulated under Chapter 2 of the Data Protection Act. They must provide all details regards the case, and this must be provided within 30 working days - use site below for advice:

http://www.ico.gov.uk/

- Approach all Parties involved who receive wages from the Public Purse, with Freedom of Information requests. Again all details must be supplied - links below will help:

http://www.foi.gov.uk/

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/FOI

Remember to use both methods for all Public Employees, as it will apply pressure from all sides.


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 21:32 
SSDi Randy Scotsman
User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008 18:49
Posts: 2994
Only thing i can say is!! guy fawkes had the right idea!!!!!!



_________________
Image
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2010 21:38 
User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 20:35
Posts: 6106
Location: Blackburn Lancashire
rofl. agree with bob, blow the bastards up !



_________________
Image
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Scottish Leaders' Debate
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2010 11:38 
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 18:36
Posts: 886
Location: shottton colliery
lol bob

i go for killing them all and making mickey mouse world leader

ever been to disney world everyone gets along

jamie :boobs:


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

Maintaining SSD-inc involves a lot of time and money. Help us by behaving nicely!


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: